![]()
Virtual Heroes |
by Amy Wall
In 1991, when President Bush announced that the United States would join its
allies and go to war against Iraq, he choked back his emotions and called
war "a necessary evil."
"What a hypocrite," I thought to myself. Just one week before, this same
man, telephoned a group of anti-abortion rights demonstrators protesting
outside the White House, and told them to keep up the good work. He called
to support their efforts toward protecting the "rights of the unborn." Bush
upheld himself as a religious, moral, man who supported the right to life,
but in the same breath he could justify sending thousands of young people
into an unknown world of possible death and destruction, based on necessity.
If war can be justified as necessary, why can't abortion?
The first time I ever gave abortion serious thought, was in my early
twenties. I was flipping through the Sunday edition of the New York Times
when I saw a full page ad that simply showed a picture of a wire hanger. It
was an ad posted by Planned Parenthood and the message was very clear, it
didn't need an explanation. I had never personally had to face the issue of
abortion, so I was surprised at what a huge impact this image had on me. I
realized that I had always taken my rights for granted. I never thought they
could be taken away from me. I thought that the right to abortion was
granted via the evolution of thought and understanding -- like desegregation
or the right to vote. I thought deconstruction of antiquated values
automatically gave me this particular right.
To this day I can't believe that this right is even questioned. As far as
I'm concerned, in this country, it shouldn't be an issue at all. Abortion
rights are still being debated in Congress, in the Supreme Court, and at
American dinner tables. We still debate the origins of life, the methods of
terminating a pregnancy, the right to privacy, and the ability of a woman to
make her own decisions. I don't get it. I don't care about the definition
of life's origins. As far as I'm concerned, the fetus is alive, and abortion
kills the fetus. It is a terribly sad thing to do, but sometimes it is
necessary. I don't believe that a fetus has rights just because it is
potentially a human being. As long as that fetus is inside of, and living
off of, its host, it cannot be an individual with rights. As long as the
fetus is in the womb, it is a part of someone's body, and everyone has a
right, at the very least, to control their own body. Just because a woman
can create life, doesn't mean she should, or that she must. Her primary
responsibility is to herself: to not get pregnant in the first place or to
terminate her pregnancy if she feels she is not ready, or able, to create a
person.
I think abortion should be accessible to all women, whether life begins at
birth, conception, or as a mere idea. I think RU-486 should be available to
women on demand, in the same way other medicines and medical procedures are
available if they are needed. Abortion is a medical decision and every
person has the right to privacy when making medical decisions. There are so
many politicians across America who insist on keeping the government out of
health care, so what right do they have to insist on invading a woman's
right to medical care. It also infuriates me that many states demand that a
woman be counseled before she is allowed to make her decision. Some states
require that she go home and think it over for 24 hours, as though she hasn't
put her heart and soul into the very act of walking into that clinic in the
first place. Of course, if a woman appears to be terribly upset, and
indecisive, any professional should suggest that she seek counseling before
making such a painful decision.
If I lived, as a woman, in a totalitarian nation, and my government told me
that I could not have an abortion, my choices would be to fight it, live with
it, or find a back-alley butcher. If I were a devoutly religious woman and
my religion told me that abortion is a sin and I would go to hell if I
committed such a sin, I guess I wouldn't have an abortion. If I believed
that there were better alternatives to abortion, I would make another
decision for myself. If I lived in China and I got pregnant with my second
child, my government would demand I have an abortion. In that case, I would
either sneak out of the country, have the abortion, or go to jail. The
wonderful thing about living in a country that gives us rights just because
we are human, is that we can all make our own choices based on our individual
desires, religions, standards of morality, and necessities. |
![]()
Virtual Heroes |
To take away choice, in this country, would be wrong -- unquestionably.
It would be the same as forcing me to believe in God, or forcing me to have
an abortion, or taking away my vote. I don't believe in a collective moral
code. In a country that was built on, and thrives on, innate rights, this
cannot be an issue of morality, it's can only be an issue of necessity. The irony of my argument is that, although I feel passionately about my rights, I personally would not have an abortion. I can't say that I would have felt that way at 18, but I do feel that way now. For me it wouldn't feel right. I don't think I could live with myself. I've witnessed what women go through when they choose abortion and I don't wish that kind of grief, pain, or guilt on anyone. I cherish my right to make my own decisions, and I challenge anyone to tell me what is right, moral, or even necessary. An unwanted pregnancy is a tragedy no matter how you look at it, but an even bigger tragedy is an unwanted child.
|
|
* The contents of this article and the opinions represented herein do not necessarily reflect those of 212.net and / or any of its affiliates. | |